Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

A2solution

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (7 reviews)
+919544874492 info@a2solution.com Visit Website

About A2solution

A2solution has been in business since 2005, delivering technology projects for clients. The company's main offerings are Mobile App Development. With 10 - 49 people on staff, A2solution can take on projects of varying size. The average project on record costs around $25,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to A2solution directly to discuss project specifics.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design SEO Android App Development iOS App Development Internet Marketing

Industries Served

Insurance Automotive Telecommunications Media & Entertainment Advertising & Marketing Information Technology Food & Beverage

A2solution Reviews

Write a Review

Technically rigorous, commercially grounded, and a genuine pleasure to work with

Erik Lindqvist / Chief Technology Officer - Nordic Cloud AB
Verified
Feb 13, 2026

Project summary: As a technology business ourselves we apply the same scrutiny to our vendor selection that our clients apply to us. We needed a delivery partner who could meet a standard we would be comfortable being measured against.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryInformation Technology
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationMar 2025 – Jan 2026

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Nordic Cloud AB is an established Information Technology organisation headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden. My role as Chief Technology Officer covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Low-Code / No-Code Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Low-Code / No-Code Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Information Technology sector looking for Low-Code / No-Code Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Project execution that matched the proposal in every dimension that mattered

Marcus Holloway / SVP of Engineering - Vertex Cloud Dynamics
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryFood & Beverage
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Vertex Cloud Dynamics is an established Food & Beverage organisation headquartered in Austin, USA. My role as SVP of Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Food & Beverage segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Low-Code / No-Code Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Low-Code / No-Code Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Low-Code / No-Code Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Food & Beverage contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Food & Beverage experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Austin, USA and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2005
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.4/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.6

FAQs

What's actually in A2solution's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but A2solution commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Internet Marketing, Android App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO, and it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Insurance, Information Technology, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment and Telecommunications.
What kind of software work does A2solution take on?
A2solution typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include iOS App Development, Internet Marketing, Android App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO.
Is A2solution more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where A2solution is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Internet Marketing, Android App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Would A2solution be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like A2solution tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Insurance, Information Technology, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment and Telecommunications, and its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Internet Marketing, Android App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO.
Does A2solution actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, A2solution included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Insurance, Information Technology, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with A2solution?
Most businesses reach A2solution through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Internet Marketing, Android App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What makes A2solution worth considering over other options?
What tends to set A2solution apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2005, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Can I just hire developers from A2solution to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like A2solution, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Insurance, Information Technology, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment and Telecommunications, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Can A2solution take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like A2solution — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Insurance, Information Technology, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2005.
What happens with A2solution after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, A2solution typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Food & Beverage, Insurance, Information Technology, Advertising & Marketing, Media & Entertainment and Telecommunications, and its listed capabilities span iOS App Development, Internet Marketing, Android App Development, Mobile App Development and SEO.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies