Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Advansoft

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (7 reviews)
+971555222147 info@advansoft.ae Visit Website

About Advansoft

At Advansoft, they are an equipped team of software experts. They are well trained & specialized in significant frequently used technologies. Their IT advising services help clients discuss critical requirements like quality, time, cost and risk management. They focus on making your company regularly productive by combining human intelligence with their technical capacities.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Web Design E-commerce Development iOS App Development Content Management System iPhone App Development

Industries Served

Real Estate Information Technology Human Resources Telecommunications Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Insurance Government & Public Sector

Advansoft Reviews

Write a Review

Custom modules that fit our operational processes rather than forcing us to change them

Siobhan Gallagher / Chief Technology Officer - Northumbria FinTech Ltd
Verified
Jan 17, 2026

Project summary: First notice of loss processing was taking three days on average. Market benchmarks were under four hours. Automation of the intake and triage workflow was the agreed priority.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

The engagement was priced at the quality level rather than the budget level. We evaluated the alternatives and concluded that the delta was a reasonable premium for the reduction in delivery risk

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryInsurance
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Chief Technology Officer at Northumbria FinTech Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Insurance operations in Edinburgh, UK. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was ERP Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Insurance sector had used them for a comparable ERP Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, ERP Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the ERP Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Insurance network — in both cases to peers facing ERP Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Service desk that outperformed our previous in-house team on every SLA we tracked

Danielle Westbrook / Chief Digital Officer - BlueSky Retail Holdings
Verified
Jan 07, 2026

Project summary: Digital service standards required all citizen-facing applications to meet accessibility and performance benchmarks that our inherited systems failed. Remediation was not viable — we needed a replacement.

Six months after go-live our platform is processing three times the transaction volume we specified in the original brief. The architecture choices made during discovery accommodated that growth without remediation work. That is the difference between a team that designs for what you tell them and a team that designs for what you are likely to need. We are in conversation about a Phase 2 engagement and I expect to be using this partnership for several years.

PROS

Collaborative culture that made the team feel like a genuine extension of our organisation, strong asynchronous communication across time zones, zero-drama handling of the inevitable mid-project changes

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIT Managed Services
IndustryGovernment & Public Sector
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMay 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
BlueSky Retail Holdings operates in the Government & Public Sector sector with headquarters in Chicago, USA. In my role as Chief Digital Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our IT Managed Services capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was IT Managed Services delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Government & Public Sector sector had used them for a comparable IT Managed Services engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, IT Managed Services depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Government & Public Sector experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.5/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.3
Communication
4.9

FAQs

Has Advansoft actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Advansoft — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Real Estate, Information Technology, Human Resources, Insurance and Government & Public Sector, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Does Advansoft only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Advansoft isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including USA, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can I just hire developers from Advansoft to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Advansoft, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, its listed capabilities span Content Management System, E-commerce Development, iOS App Development, iPhone App Development and Mobile App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
What happens with Advansoft after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Advansoft typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span Content Management System, E-commerce Development, iOS App Development, iPhone App Development and Mobile App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Real Estate, Information Technology, Human Resources, Insurance and Government & Public Sector.
What does Advansoft's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Advansoft generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Real Estate, Information Technology, Human Resources, Insurance and Government & Public Sector, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
What should I expect to pay to work with Advansoft?
What Advansoft charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Advansoft's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $100000+.
Can Advansoft take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Advansoft — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has served clients in USA, and it has experience across industries such as Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, Real Estate, Information Technology, Human Resources, Insurance and Government & Public Sector.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Advansoft?
Most companies structured like Advansoft give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Content Management System, E-commerce Development, iOS App Development, iPhone App Development and Mobile App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Will Advansoft sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Advansoft, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span Content Management System, E-commerce Development, iOS App Development, iPhone App Development and Mobile App Development.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies