Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Appinventiv

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (7 reviews)
+918826909998 sales@appinventiv.com Visit Website

About Appinventiv

Appinventiv is a technology company founded in 2014. Their core services include Custom Software Development. The company operates with a team of 500 - 999 professionals. Typical hourly rates run around < $25/hr, with an average project cost near $5,000,000. This profile is a starting point — reach out to Appinventiv directly to discuss project specifics.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development AR App Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Chat Bots & AI Development Internet of Things Blockchain Development Cryptocurrency Wallet Development Supply Chain Blockchain Hyperledger Smart Contracts Development ICO consulting Blockchain Implementation

Industries Served

Telecommunications Construction Human Resources Fashion & Apparel Automotive Travel & Hospitality Healthcare

Appinventiv Reviews

Write a Review

A partnership that began with a single project and earned a place on our preferred vendor list

Kelsey Drummond / Director of Digital Health - Crestline Health Partners
Verified
Feb 23, 2026

Project summary: Our mobile app had a 2.9-star average review score. The two themes in every negative review were speed and booking flow complexity — both were solvable with the right engineering partner.

We had worked with three agencies before this engagement. The comparison is not flattering to the others. What distinguished this team was a systematic approach to understanding the problem before proposing a solution — something that sounds obvious and is practiced far less often than it should be. The delivery phase ran to schedule, the codebase is clean enough that our internal engineers made positive comments during handover review, and we have not logged a critical incident in five months of live operation. We intend to use them for our next phase of work.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryTravel & Hospitality
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationMay 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Crestline Health Partners is an established Travel & Hospitality organisation headquartered in Houston, USA. My role as Director of Digital Health covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Low-Code / No-Code Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Low-Code / No-Code Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Travel & Hospitality sector had used them for a comparable Low-Code / No-Code Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Low-Code / No-Code Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Travel & Hospitality network — in both cases to peers facing Low-Code / No-Code Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

A technology investment that delivered returns ahead of the business case we approved

Beatriz Cavalcanti / Chief Digital Officer - Cerrado Tech SA
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: Integration between our clinic management system and our patient-facing app had been a recurring failure point. We needed an engineering partner who could own the integration layer end to end.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryHealthcare
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationJul 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Cerrado Tech SA operates in the Healthcare sector with headquarters in Brasília, Brazil. In my role as Chief Digital Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Industry-Specific Solutions lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Industry-Specific Solutions approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Healthcare contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Healthcare network — in both cases to peers facing Industry-Specific Solutions challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2014
Employees 500 - 999
Hourly Rate < $25
Client Rating 4.5/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.4
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Does Appinventiv actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Appinventiv included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Blockchain Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development and Custom Software Development, and it has been operating since 2014.
What kinds of industries has Appinventiv actually built for?
Appinventiv has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Travel & Hospitality, Human Resources, Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare and Telecommunications.
What should I expect to pay to work with Appinventiv?
What Appinventiv charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Appinventiv's typical hourly rate is around < $25, with an average project cost of $5000000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Appinventiv to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Appinventiv, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality, Human Resources, Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare and Telecommunications, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Appinventiv?
Most businesses reach Appinventiv through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality, Human Resources, Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2014.
Can I just hire developers from Appinventiv to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Appinventiv, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality, Human Resources, Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 500 - 999 professionals.
Can Appinventiv take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Appinventiv — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality, Human Resources, Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare and Telecommunications, and its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Blockchain Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development and Custom Software Development.
Would Appinventiv be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Appinventiv tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Blockchain Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Cryptocurrency Wallet Development and Custom Software Development, and its typical hourly rate is around < $25.
What makes Appinventiv worth considering over other options?
What tends to set Appinventiv apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2014, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Is Appinventiv more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Appinventiv is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Travel & Hospitality, Human Resources, Construction, Fashion & Apparel, Healthcare and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2014.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies