Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Barques

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+441212332080 hello@barques.co.uk Visit Website

About Barques

With extensive experience in a diversity of sectors and having worked for some impressive names along the way, they have the respect and understanding you would expect from a company known for getting results. They have been regularly and successfully developing a reputation for delivering excellence locally, nationally and internationally for over two decades.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Web Design Branding E-commerce Development SEO

Industries Served

Logistics & Supply Chain Automotive Retail & E-commerce Media & Entertainment Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Telecommunications

Barques Reviews

Write a Review

QA coverage that finally made Friday deployments feel like a professional activity

Théo Beaumont / VP of Innovation - Laurentian Tech Partners
Verified
Jan 09, 2026

Project summary: Time-to-market for new tariff structures had become a direct competitive disadvantage. Our product configuration layer was the bottleneck and it needed to be modernised as a priority.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeQuality Assurance & Testing
IndustryTelecommunications
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJan 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Laurentian Tech Partners, a growth-stage Telecommunications business based in Montreal, Canada. As VP of Innovation my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our Quality Assurance & Testing capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Quality Assurance & Testing lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Montreal, Canada and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Sensor network and analytics layer built by engineers who understood both halves equally

Declan Hartley / Chief Digital Officer - Southern Cross Technology
Verified
Jan 04, 2026

Project summary: A content deal had given us the rights to a major catalogue but our delivery infrastructure could not stream it reliably at scale. We needed a cloud-native video platform in under six months.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

The quality of documentation they produce means our team needed to set aside dedicated review time to do it justice — a minor scheduling point rather than a genuine criticism

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Southern Cross Technology operates in the Media & Entertainment sector with headquarters in Sydney, Australia. In my role as Chief Digital Officer I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant IoT Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end IoT Development delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the IoT Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Media & Entertainment sector looking for IoT Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 1989
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.8
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.8
Communication
4.7

FAQs

What's actually in Barques's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Barques commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain, Retail & E-commerce, Media & Entertainment, Automotive and Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, and its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO and UI-UX Design.
Does Barques only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Barques isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including United-kingdom, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Can Barques take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Barques — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Branding, E-commerce Development, Mobile App Development, SEO and UI-UX Design, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
Will Barques sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Barques, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in United-kingdom, and it has been operating since 1989.
What happens with Barques after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Barques typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain, Retail & E-commerce, Media & Entertainment, Automotive and Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Roughly how long does a project with Barques take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Barques can scale resources based on project urgency.
What kinds of industries has Barques actually built for?
Barques has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain, Retail & E-commerce, Media & Entertainment, Automotive and Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology.
What does Barques's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Barques generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has served clients in United-kingdom, and it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain, Retail & E-commerce, Media & Entertainment, Automotive and Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology.
Would Barques be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Barques tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Logistics & Supply Chain, Retail & E-commerce, Media & Entertainment, Automotive and Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
What should I expect to pay to work with Barques?
What Barques charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Barques's typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199, with an average project cost of $2500000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies