Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Boise Web

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.4/5 (7 reviews)
+12085142556 contact@boiseweb.co Visit Website

About Boise Web

Specializing in web development, graphic, logo & web design, we love working with both local business as well as those who are looking to sell online. Their team works best with clients who share in our strong set of ethics and morals. They are not only highly skilled but equally value-driven. They understand the difficulties of starting a new business from the ground up.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development Ethereum Blockchain

Industries Served

Nonprofit & NGO Advertising & Marketing Agriculture Retail & E-commerce Gaming & Gambling Automotive

Boise Web Reviews

Write a Review

ERP rollout that went live on the agreed date — we know how significant that is

Hyun-Su Lim / Director of Platform - Hanam Tech Solutions
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: Our connected vehicle platform needed to handle telemetry data from an expanding EV fleet while supporting over-the-air update orchestration. No off-the-shelf platform handled both requirements well.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeERP Development
IndustryAutomotive
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationAug 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Hanam Tech Solutions, a growth-stage Automotive business based in Incheon, South Korea. As Director of Platform my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Automotive segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The ERP Development changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full ERP Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Automotive experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Automotive sector looking for ERP Development expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

App store launch with a four-point-eight average rating in the first month

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 03, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

I came into this engagement as a sceptic. We had been through a failed implementation with a previous vendor and I had high standards for what evidence of competence looked like before I would trust a partner with our core systems. This team earned that trust progressively — through the quality of the discovery documentation, the rigour of the technical proposals, the consistency of the sprint deliveries, and ultimately the stability of the production system. I no longer lead with scepticism when recommending them.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeMobile App Development
IndustryAgriculture
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd is an established Agriculture organisation headquartered in Singapore. My role as CTO covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Mobile App Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was Mobile App Development delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Agriculture sector had used them for a comparable Mobile App Development engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Mobile App Development depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The ROI case we presented to our board was conservative by design. Current performance against the financial model suggests we will hit the projected payback point in under twelve months against an eighteen-month target. The operational efficiency gains in particular have exceeded the model, in part because the quality of the data the new platform generates supports decisions that the previous system could not.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Agriculture network — in both cases to peers facing Mobile App Development challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2013
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $50 - $99
Client Rating 4.4/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.3
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.5

FAQs

What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Boise Web to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Boise Web, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Retail & E-commerce and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
Will Boise Web sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Boise Web, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Has Boise Web actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Boise Web — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Retail & E-commerce and Nonprofit & NGO, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What's actually in Boise Web's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Boise Web commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Retail & E-commerce and Nonprofit & NGO, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Boise Web?
Most companies structured like Boise Web give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Retail & E-commerce and Nonprofit & NGO, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What does Boise Web's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Boise Web generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Retail & E-commerce and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $25000+.
What happens with Boise Web after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Boise Web typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Boise Web instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Boise Web a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development, Ethereum Blockchain, VR App Development and Web Development, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What should I expect to pay to work with Boise Web?
What Boise Web charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Boise Web's typical hourly rate is around $50 - $99, with an average project cost of $25000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Boise Web?
Most businesses reach Boise Web through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Agriculture, Automotive, Gaming & Gambling, Advertising & Marketing, Retail & E-commerce and Nonprofit & NGO, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies