Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Closeloop Technologies

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (7 reviews)
+1 (650) 265 7175 sales@closeloop.com Visit Website

About Closeloop Technologies

Closeloop is a leading software development and design firm in Mountain View, California, in business for over 11 years. Headed by bright personalities with a mission-driven approach, Closeloop helps start-ups establish from scratch, small and medium scale companies develop life-enhancing digital solutions for increased productivity and growth. We also provide software engineering services to premium enterprises for enhanced performance.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Wearable App Development IoT App Development UI-UX Design Web Design Virtual Reality E-commerce Development Web App Development

Industries Served

Gaming & Gambling Fashion & Apparel Construction Sports & Fitness Aerospace & Defense Human Resources

Closeloop Technologies Reviews

Write a Review

E-commerce build that united our digital and in-store inventory for the first time

Maja Söderström / Head of Product Engineering - Scandia Digital AB
Verified
Feb 08, 2026

Project summary: A previous engagement had delivered something that worked in staging and struggled in production. We approached this project with greater rigour in vendor selection as a result.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Senior-level engineering presence throughout the entire project, not just during the pitch, honest and commercially fair handling of scope changes, codebase that our internal team praised on review

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeE-commerce Development
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationFeb 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Scandia Digital AB operates in the Aerospace & Defense sector with headquarters in Gothenburg, Sweden. In my role as Head of Product Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our E-commerce Development capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full E-commerce Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Aerospace & Defense experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Project execution that matched the proposal in every dimension that mattered

Reuben Loh / CTO - Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd
Verified
Jan 11, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

The integration layer was the part of the project I was most concerned about going in. Our system landscape is complex, several of the upstream APIs we relied on were poorly documented, and two third-party vendors had a history of unpredictable response times on integration questions. This team managed all of that. They documented what the upstream vendors could not, built resilience into the integration architecture where the upstream behaviour was unreliable, and delivered a solution that works as specified in production. I could not have asked for more.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

We underestimated the input required from our subject matter experts during the requirements phase. The team flagged this early but our resource planning did not fully reflect it — our responsibility, not theirs

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeIndustry-Specific Solutions
IndustryHuman Resources
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationMar 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As CTO at Marina Bay Ventures Pte Ltd I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Human Resources operations in Singapore. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Human Resources segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The Industry-Specific Solutions changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Industry-Specific Solutions, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
The quality of the questions they asked during the briefing process was the first indicator. Vendors who ask precise questions in the sales phase tend to apply the same rigour during delivery. That hypothesis proved accurate. The technical proposal was substantive, the team structure was senior throughout, and the pricing was transparent.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Thoroughly and precisely. The requirements document they produced was detailed enough that our QA team used it directly to write acceptance criteria. Every user story had a defined business objective attached. Nothing was left to interpretation. That discipline in the requirements phase paid dividends throughout development and testing.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Singapore and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The continuity of the team. The engineers who participated in the discovery sessions were the engineers who built the system. That consistency of institutional knowledge across a six-month project has a value that is difficult to quantify but easy to notice when it is absent. Every conversation built on the previous ones.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Unreservedly. We are in active scoping conversations for a second engagement and I expect this to develop into a multi-year partnership. For any organisation in the Human Resources sector looking for Industry-Specific Solutions expertise combined with genuine delivery discipline, I would put this team at the top of the evaluation list.

Company Info

Founded 2011
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.8/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.8
Cost
4.4
Communication
4.8

FAQs

Will Closeloop Technologies sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Closeloop Technologies, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has served clients in India, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
Can I just hire developers from Closeloop Technologies to sit alongside my own team?
Usually, yes — a dedicated developer arrangement is a common option with firms like Closeloop Technologies, where you get engineers working exclusively on your project as an extension of your in-house team rather than as a separate outsourced unit. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
Does Closeloop Technologies only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Closeloop Technologies isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, including India, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
What kinds of industries has Closeloop Technologies actually built for?
Closeloop Technologies has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction.
Roughly how long does a project with Closeloop Technologies take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Closeloop Technologies can scale resources based on project urgency.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Closeloop Technologies?
Most businesses reach Closeloop Technologies through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction, and it has been operating since 2011.
Is Closeloop Technologies more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Closeloop Technologies is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has served clients in India, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction.
Has Closeloop Technologies actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Closeloop Technologies — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What's actually in Closeloop Technologies's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Closeloop Technologies commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in India, and it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction.
What happens with Closeloop Technologies after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Closeloop Technologies typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Gaming & Gambling, Aerospace & Defense, Fashion & Apparel, Sports & Fitness, Human Resources and Construction, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies