Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Hounder

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.5/5 (7 reviews)
+19512956815 info@hounder.co Visit Website

About Hounder

Hounder is a digital design and development company that makes meaningful web experiences and products across platforms for organizations that are serious about digital. The number one thing they care about is helping companies, from small startups to large enterprises, create incredible products and web experiences that scale and see actual results.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development Unity 3D Game Development Wearable App Development Enterprise App Modernization Chat Bots & AI Development App Marketing iPhone App Development Supply Chain Blockchain

Industries Served

Events & Event Management Healthcare Nonprofit & NGO Advertising & Marketing Gaming & Gambling Media & Entertainment

Hounder Reviews

Write a Review

Penetration test that found things our previous vendor had missed for two consecutive years

Shreya Krishnaswamy / VP of Product - Luminar Tech Pvt Ltd
Verified
Jan 26, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Deep domain knowledge that reduced the discovery overhead significantly, proactive risk identification before issues became incidents, delivery cadence that our stakeholders found reassuring

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeCybersecurity
IndustryGaming & Gambling
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationApr 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Luminar Tech Pvt Ltd operates in the Gaming & Gambling sector with headquarters in Hyderabad, India. In my role as VP of Product I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Cybersecurity delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Cybersecurity approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Gaming & Gambling contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
The project management framework was the most structured I have experienced with an external vendor. Sprint planning was tight, acceptance criteria were specific, retrospectives were honest and acted on. The project manager treated the shared backlog as a live document and the risk register as an operational tool rather than a compliance artefact. I never had to ask for a status update.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Cybersecurity work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

A DevOps engagement that delivered cultural change as well as technical change

Radosław Kowalczyk / Head of Development - Wisła Software Sp zoo
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: A content deal had given us the rights to a major catalogue but our delivery infrastructure could not stream it reliably at scale. We needed a cloud-native video platform in under six months.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Commercially transparent throughout — no hidden assumptions, no bill shock at the end, change requests that were fair and clearly explained rather than used as a margin-recovery mechanism

CONS

Time zone coordination required some deliberate overlap management from both sides in the first couple of sprints, after which we had an efficient async rhythm that worked for the whole project

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeDevOps Services
IndustryMedia & Entertainment
Project Cost$50,000 to $149,999
DurationJan 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Wisła Software Sp zoo is an established Media & Entertainment organisation headquartered in Warsaw, Poland. My role as Head of Development covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
The immediate problem was that our DevOps Services capability had become the bottleneck limiting our ability to grow. Every feature request, every new client requirement, every internal initiative was delayed by a platform that had been extended beyond its original design. We needed a rebuild, not a patch.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The core engagement was DevOps Services delivery, though their scope expanded to include technical consultancy during discovery that materially improved our requirements. They also took ownership of the third-party integration workstream that had been a coordination challenge in previous projects, removing that complexity from our internal team entirely.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Warsaw, Poland and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Media & Entertainment network — in both cases to peers facing DevOps Services challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Company Info

Founded 2016
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $200 - $300
Client Rating 4.5/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.4
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.7

FAQs

What does Hounder's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Hounder generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Wearable App Development, and it has experience across industries such as Healthcare, Gaming & Gambling, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Nonprofit & NGO and Advertising & Marketing.
Will Hounder sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Hounder, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Healthcare, Gaming & Gambling, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Nonprofit & NGO and Advertising & Marketing, and it has been operating since 2016.
Roughly how long does a project with Hounder take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, Hounder can scale resources based on project urgency.
Has Hounder actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Hounder — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Wearable App Development, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Hounder instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Hounder a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Healthcare, Gaming & Gambling, Events & Event Management, Media & Entertainment, Nonprofit & NGO and Advertising & Marketing, and its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Wearable App Development.
Can Hounder take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Hounder — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Wearable App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What should I expect to pay to work with Hounder?
What Hounder charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Hounder's typical hourly rate is around $200 - $300, with an average project cost of $50000+.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with Hounder?
Most businesses reach Hounder through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Wearable App Development, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
Is Hounder more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Hounder is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, iPhone App Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Chat Bots & AI Development and Wearable App Development, and it has been operating since 2016.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies