Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Icreon

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.7/5 (7 reviews)
+12127066021 consulting@icreon.com Visit Website

About Icreon

At Icreon, they speak the one language that matters, business. For well over a decade, they have provided customized, process-driven digital solutions for clients in the global marketplace. They consult and develop solutions & platforms that allow businesses to leverage cutting-edge technology for a competitive advantage. They have already delivered solutions of all scales and industries ranging from plugin development to eCommerce development to data analytics tools and beyond.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development Unity 3D Game Development Custom Software Development iPhone App Development Crypto Exchange Development

Industries Served

Insurance Environmental Services Real Estate Government & Public Sector Fashion & Apparel Aerospace & Defense Food & Beverage

Icreon Reviews

Write a Review

Analytics foundation that lets us answer attribution questions we had given up asking

Maja Söderström / Head of Product Engineering - Scandia Digital AB
Verified
Jan 07, 2026

Project summary: The project had a board-facing delivery date tied to a strategic initiative. We needed a partner who would treat that date as their own, not ours.

Our stakeholder group included board members, clinical leads, compliance officers, and end users — each with different technical literacy and different success criteria. This team navigated that stakeholder landscape as well as any vendor I have seen. They adjusted their communication register depending on the audience without losing the substance. They managed expectations honestly throughout. And they delivered a system that each group can point to as meeting their requirements. That breadth is genuinely uncommon.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

5.0
Overall
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeDigital Marketing
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project Cost$150,000 to $499,999
DurationJul 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Scandia Digital AB operates in the Aerospace & Defense sector with headquarters in Gothenburg, Sweden. In my role as Head of Product Engineering I am accountable for the full technology agenda — infrastructure, product, and vendor relationships. We are a commercially driven organisation and every technology decision is evaluated against a clear business case before it is approved.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Digital Marketing investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
End-to-end Digital Marketing delivery with particular depth in the integration and data migration components, which were the highest-risk elements of the programme. They supplemented this with a dedicated QA resource throughout development and a documented runbook for our operations team at handover.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Aerospace & Defense sector had used them for a comparable Digital Marketing engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Digital Marketing depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Communication was proactive, timely, and appropriately calibrated. Technical updates for the engineering audience, executive summaries for the steering group, risk flags with proposed mitigations rather than just problem statements. The fortnightly sprint reviews gave our stakeholders visibility without requiring them to attend every working session.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Digital Marketing work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes, without reservation. I have already made two direct referrals within my Aerospace & Defense network — in both cases to peers facing Digital Marketing challenges similar to ours. I gave those referrals with confidence because I knew the experience I described was reproducible, not the result of exceptional circumstances on our engagement.

Machine learning in production that the board could see working within eight weeks

Matthieu Renard / Directeur Technique - Lumière Technologies SAS
Verified
Jan 05, 2026

Project summary: Several years of incremental development had left us with a platform that was technically functional but strategically limiting. A structured rebuild was the agreed path forward.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Architectural decisions designed for longevity rather than just the current brief, thorough automated test coverage, post-launch stability that validated every technical choice made during discovery

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeAI & Machine Learning
IndustryFood & Beverage
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMay 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Directeur Technique at Lumière Technologies SAS I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Food & Beverage operations in Paris, France. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Regulatory requirements in our Food & Beverage segment had changed and the compliance timeline was set by our regulator, not by us. The AI & Machine Learning changes required were significant enough to justify engaging a specialist partner rather than diverting our internal team from the product roadmap.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full AI & Machine Learning lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Extremely well, in part because they had relevant Food & Beverage experience that reduced the context-setting overhead significantly. They understood the domain vocabulary, asked the right questions, and translated business requirements into technical specifications with a fidelity that meant the development phase had very few clarification cycles.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Paris, France and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the AI & Machine Learning work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The willingness to be direct. When our requirements were unclear they said so. When our priorities were contradictory they explained why. When a technical approach we had assumed was the right one turned out to have significant downsides, they told us before we had committed to it. That kind of intellectual honesty is what I look for in a long-term technology partner.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex AI & Machine Learning programme in the Food & Beverage space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded 2000
Employees 500 - 999
Hourly Rate $150 - $199
Client Rating 4.7/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.7
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.6
Communication
4.8

FAQs

Does Icreon actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Icreon included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Real Estate and Government & Public Sector, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Will Icreon sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Icreon, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Custom Software Development and VR App Development, and it reports a team size of 500 - 999 professionals.
What happens with Icreon after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Icreon typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Real Estate and Government & Public Sector, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
Can Icreon take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Icreon — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Real Estate and Government & Public Sector, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
Would Icreon be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Icreon tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Custom Software Development and VR App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $150 - $199.
What kind of software work does Icreon take on?
Icreon typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Custom Software Development and VR App Development.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Icreon?
Most companies structured like Icreon give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Unity 3D Game Development, Crypto Exchange Development, iPhone App Development, Custom Software Development and VR App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.
What kinds of industries has Icreon actually built for?
Icreon has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Aerospace & Defense, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Real Estate and Government & Public Sector.
Does Icreon only work locally, or take on clients elsewhere too?
Icreon isn't necessarily limited to one region and may take on clients across several countries, depending on market demand and business partnerships.
Is Icreon more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Icreon is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Aerospace & Defense, Food & Beverage, Environmental Services, Fashion & Apparel, Real Estate and Government & Public Sector, and its average project cost is reported at $2500000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies