Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

LOOP

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.8/5 (6 reviews)
+436628720310 office@agentur-loop.com Visit Website

About LOOP

They are idea-driven, working with a great focus on design and user experience. They create amazing digital things that people like to be part of and use. They see technology as a productive system. They help you to uncover how your brand should work in the digital landscape and identify the best opportunities. Truly, they craft digital ideas that people like to be part of.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development Chat Bots & AI Development Mobile App Design App Marketing Crypto Exchange Development

Industries Served

Environmental Services Advertising & Marketing Travel & Hospitality Nonprofit & NGO Telecommunications Construction

LOOP Reviews

Write a Review

Technically rigorous, commercially grounded, and a genuine pleasure to work with

Adriana Voss / Director of Platform Engineering - Cascadia Digital Ventures
Verified
Jan 17, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

We gave this team an aggressive timeline, a technically complex scope, and a client-side project team that was stretched thin and not always available at the speed the engagement required. They absorbed all of that gracefully. Where they needed input they were precise about what they needed and when. Where they could proceed independently they did. The result was a delivery that landed on time despite the constraints on our side, which I regard as evidence of genuine professional maturity.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeLow-Code / No-Code Development
IndustryConstruction
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationMar 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Cascadia Digital Ventures, a growth-stage Construction business based in Vancouver, Canada. As Director of Platform Engineering my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
Primarily Low-Code / No-Code Development, with adjacent work in solution architecture and quality assurance. They were responsible for the full build from requirements through to go-live, including integration with four existing systems in our technology landscape. The breadth they covered without requiring additional vendors was commercially and logistically valuable.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Low-Code / No-Code Development approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Construction contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes. I had privately built a contingency expectation into my planning given the project complexity and the number of integrations involved. None of that contingency was needed. The delivery landed on the agreed date and the final invoice matched the approved budget to within a fraction of a percent. That outcome is rarer than the industry acknowledges.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Low-Code / No-Code Development work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Yes. I would add the context that this is not the cheapest option in the market and they are selective about the engagements they take on. If your primary criterion is price, there are alternatives. If you want a technology partner who can be trusted with a complex Low-Code / No-Code Development programme in the Construction space and will deliver against a serious brief, this is the team.

Company Info

Founded N/A
Employees N/A
Hourly Rate N/A
Client Rating 4.8/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.8
Schedule
4.8
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.8

FAQs

Would LOOP be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like LOOP tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO.
What kind of software work does LOOP take on?
LOOP typically covers the standard range of software development work — mobile apps, web platforms, custom internal tools, UI/UX design, cloud infrastructure, AI integrations, and larger enterprise builds. Its core focus areas include Crypto Exchange Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development.
What does LOOP's actual delivery process look like week to week?
LOOP generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO, and its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development.
Has LOOP actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like LOOP — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development, and it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO.
What kinds of industries has LOOP actually built for?
LOOP has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO.
What's actually in LOOP's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but LOOP commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO, and its listed capabilities span Crypto Exchange Development, Chat Bots & AI Development, Mobile App Design, App Marketing and Web Development.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like LOOP to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as LOOP, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO, and its average project cost is reported at $100000+.
Will LOOP sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including LOOP, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Telecommunications, Construction, Travel & Hospitality, Advertising & Marketing, Environmental Services and Nonprofit & NGO, and it reports a team size of N/A professionals.
What makes LOOP worth considering over other options?
What tends to set LOOP apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in N/A, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
What should I expect to pay to work with LOOP?
What LOOP charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, LOOP's typical hourly rate is around N/A, with an average project cost of $100000+.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies