About Three Fourteen

Three Fourteen Ltd. is an international team of experienced designers and developers. They believe that intellect and creativity are tools that enable them to make things simple. Not only do companies need mobile friendly websites but they can benefit from Apps as well and demonstrate that they are close to their customers and show that they understand their customers’ needs.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Web Design

Industries Served

Insurance Automotive Telecommunications Mining & Metals Government & Public Sector Legal Services

Three Fourteen Reviews

Write a Review

Sensor network and analytics layer built by engineers who understood both halves equally

Liselotte Bakker / Head of Platform Engineering - Harbour Digital BV
Verified
Feb 22, 2026

Project summary: Our client portal had been built in 2017 and had not received meaningful investment since. Clients were contrasting it unfavourably with the portals of our competitors in pitches.

The technical quality of the final deliverable is the easiest thing to point to. The automated test coverage is thorough, the deployment pipeline is reliable, the documentation is genuinely useful rather than ceremonially produced. But the metric I keep returning to is the number of post-launch conversations we have not had to have. No incident calls at two in the morning. No emergency patches. No retrospective discussions about what went wrong. The absence of those events is the evidence I would show to someone considering this vendor.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their discovery process is more rigorous than we were accustomed to and required more preparation from our side than we had initially allocated — but the quality of what followed justified every hour of it

4.5
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeIoT Development
IndustryLegal Services
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJul 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
As Head of Platform Engineering at Harbour Digital BV I oversee technology investment and delivery across our Legal Services operations in Utrecht, Netherlands. We are a commercially focused business and our technology choices are always evaluated in terms of their direct contribution to business outcomes rather than technical elegance alone.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant IoT Development investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full IoT Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Better than we managed ourselves going in. The workshops they facilitated surfaced assumptions we had not examined and exposed three requirements that were in direct conflict with each other. Resolving those before development began saved us what would certainly have been significant rework later in the project.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Utrecht, Netherlands and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2007
Employees 2 - 9
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.8/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.6
Schedule
4.6
Cost
4.7
Communication
4.7

FAQs

Has Three Fourteen actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like Three Fourteen — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Legal Services, Automotive, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Will Three Fourteen sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Three Fourteen, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Legal Services, Automotive, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Roughly how long does a project with Three Fourteen take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 2 - 9 professionals, Three Fourteen can scale resources based on project urgency.
Is Three Fourteen more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where Three Fourteen is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Legal Services, Automotive, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 2 - 9 professionals.
What are the actual contract options if I want to work with Three Fourteen?
Most companies structured like Three Fourteen give you a choice between a fixed-price contract, a dedicated team arrangement, or time-and-materials billing, so you can pick whichever lines up with your budget and how well-defined your scope already is. For context, its listed capabilities span Custom Software Development, Mobile App Development, UI-UX Design, Web Design and Web Development, and it has been operating since 2007.
What does Three Fourteen's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Three Fourteen generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Legal Services, Automotive, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2007.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Three Fourteen instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Three Fourteen a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has served clients in Ireland, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like Three Fourteen to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as Three Fourteen, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Legal Services, Automotive, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Telecommunications, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Can Three Fourteen take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like Three Fourteen — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Legal Services, Automotive, Mining & Metals, Insurance and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2007.
What should I expect to pay to work with Three Fourteen?
What Three Fourteen charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Three Fourteen's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $5000000+.