Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

Two Tall Totems

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.1/5 (7 reviews)
+18883154476 sales@twotalltotems.com Visit Website

About Two Tall Totems

They are a leading mobile app development company. They develop beautiful and effective mobile apps and websites for enterprise customers and entrepreneurs looking to develop their dreams. They are approachable, skilled, artistic and even a bit nerdy. They cover a design-first philosophy with deep expertise in advanced communications, security, and web services integration.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development Web Development VR App Development AR App Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Web Design iOS App Development iPhone App Development

Industries Served

Fashion & Apparel Construction Environmental Services Automotive Travel & Hospitality Aerospace & Defense Telecommunications

Two Tall Totems Reviews

Write a Review

Sales visibility we had been requesting for three years, delivered in fourteen weeks

Ji-Woo Park / VP of Engineering - Seoul Digital Corp
Verified
Mar 05, 2026

Project summary: Our internal product thinking was strong but our execution capability in this specific technology domain was limited. We needed depth, not generalism.

The project brief was ambitious and we had received proposals ranging from two to five times our eventual budget from other vendors. This team came back with a proposal that was commercially realistic and technically credible — and then delivered against it. That alignment between proposal and outcome is not something I take for granted. I have been on the other side of it enough times to know it requires both honesty in the sales process and discipline in delivery. We experienced both.

PROS

Production system that has performed as specified since go-live without remediation work, documentation thorough enough to support internal maintenance, knowledge transfer that left our team genuinely capable

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.5
Communication
Project TypeCRM Development
IndustryAerospace & Defense
Project CostLess than $10,000
DurationJul 2025 – Dec 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Seoul Digital Corp is an established Aerospace & Defense organisation headquartered in Seoul, South Korea. My role as VP of Engineering covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
Our platform had been maintained by a previous vendor for three years and the accumulated technical debt had reached a point where delivery velocity had dropped to a fraction of what it should have been. We needed fresh engineering expertise and a structured plan to address the underlying issues.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full CRM Development lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We had a failed engagement behind us and were more rigorous in our selection process as a result. We asked detailed questions about how they managed scope change, how they handled estimation, and how they communicated problems. The answers were specific, evidenced, and consistent across the team members we spoke to. That gave us confidence that the process was real rather than rehearsed.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
The project landed on time. The budget was managed within the agreed ceiling, which included one client-driven scope addition that was quoted fairly and handled without affecting the original delivery stream. The discipline around budget transparency throughout meant there was no surprise at invoice stage.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
The most direct measure is the performance of the system in production. In the five months since go-live we have had zero P1 incidents, our page performance scores have improved across every Core Web Vitals metric, and two enterprise clients who had cited our previous platform limitations during contract negotiations have since renewed without that objection arising.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

A QA partner who treated our product quality as a personal responsibility

Théo Beaumont / VP of Innovation - Laurentian Tech Partners
Verified
Jan 19, 2026

Project summary: B2B customer churn was concentrated among accounts that had complained about portal usability. We needed a complete redesign of the self-service experience before the next contract renewal cycle.

What made the most difference in practice was the quality of the engineering judgment on this team. Not the ability to execute a specification — that is a baseline expectation. The ability to recognise when a specification was suboptimal, explain why, propose an alternative, and support the client in making a decision about it. That consultative dimension elevated the output beyond what the brief described and resulted in a product that is more fit for purpose than the one we had originally specified.

PROS

Delivery timeline that proved achievable rather than optimistic, estimation accuracy that reflected real analysis rather than competitive bidding, scope discipline that prevented the feature creep we had experienced before

CONS

Their insistence on a detailed functional specification before development began felt like friction at the time. In retrospect, it was the reason the development phase ran without the ambiguity that has derailed similar projects for us previously

4.0
Overall
4.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Communication
Project TypeQuality Assurance & Testing
IndustryTelecommunications
Project Cost$10,000 to $49,999
DurationJul 2025 – Oct 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
Laurentian Tech Partners is an established Telecommunications organisation headquartered in Montreal, Canada. My role as VP of Innovation covers both strategic planning and operational technology delivery. We maintain high standards for our vendors because our clients hold us to high standards — a bar we expect our partners to meet.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Quality Assurance & Testing investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Quality Assurance & Testing lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
We ran a structured shortlisting process across five vendors. The technical evaluation eliminated two immediately. Of the remaining three, this team's proposal was differentiated by the specificity of their Quality Assurance & Testing approach and the evidence base they provided — reference projects in Telecommunications contexts, not generic case studies. The reference calls confirmed a track record that the proposal had described accurately.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Outstanding. The discipline around asynchronous communication was particularly effective given the time zones involved between Montreal, Canada and the delivery team. Written updates were specific and consistent, response times were same-day for anything that required a decision, and nothing fell through the cracks across a six-month engagement.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
On time and within the approved budget. The estimation accuracy was notable — they had broken the work down in sufficient detail during discovery that their forecast proved reliable throughout, rather than being a number that shifted with every change in scope. We received one change request and it was for scope we had introduced ourselves.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
We went live four months ago. User adoption exceeded the target we had set by 23 percent in the first month. Support ticket volume has dropped measurably. The features we had deferred because the previous architecture made them prohibitively expensive to build are now in development. The platform they built has opened our roadmap.
What did you like most about working with this company?
Their instinct for keeping the business objective visible throughout technical decision-making. I have worked with technically excellent teams who lose the strategic thread as complexity increases. This team maintained a clear connection between every architectural choice and the outcome we had agreed to achieve. That orientation made the trade-off conversations significantly easier.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2010
Employees 10 - 49
Hourly Rate $100 - $149
Client Rating 4.1/5 (7 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.1
Schedule
4.1
Cost
4.2
Communication
4.4

FAQs

Will Two Tall Totems sign an NDA before we even discuss the project in detail?
Most professional shops, including Two Tall Totems, expect to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement before getting into specifics — it's a fairly standard ask and a reasonable one to make before sharing anything sensitive. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Telecommunications, Construction, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What happens with Two Tall Totems after the project actually launches?
Like most established software teams, Two Tall Totems typically sticks around post-launch for ongoing maintenance — bug fixes, performance tuning, security patching, new feature work, and general technical support. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Telecommunications, Construction, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and it has been operating since 2010.
What does Two Tall Totems's actual delivery process look like week to week?
Two Tall Totems generally runs something close to a standard structured process — requirements gathering, UI/UX design, development in agile sprints, QA testing along the way, deployment, and support once it's live. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Telecommunications, Construction, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of Two Tall Totems instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving Two Tall Totems a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, it has experience across industries such as Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Telecommunications, Construction, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
Does Two Tall Totems actually build with AI, or just talk about it?
Plenty of modern software teams, Two Tall Totems included, now build real AI and machine learning features — chatbots, predictive models, computer vision, and automation that goes beyond simple rule-based scripts. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Custom Software Development, iOS App Development, iPhone App Development and Mobile App Development, and it reports a team size of 10 - 49 professionals.
What's actually in Two Tall Totems's technical toolkit?
The exact stack shifts by project, but Two Tall Totems commonly works across things like React, Angular, Vue.js, Node.js, Python, .NET, Java, PHP, Flutter, React Native, native iOS and Android, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its average project cost is reported at $50000+.
What should I expect to pay to work with Two Tall Totems?
What Two Tall Totems charges comes down to a handful of variables — how complex the project is, the number of development hours involved, the tech stack required, team size, and which engagement model you pick. Based on available data, Two Tall Totems's typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149, with an average project cost of $50000+.
Roughly how long does a project with Two Tall Totems take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 10 - 49 professionals, Two Tall Totems can scale resources based on project urgency.
Would Two Tall Totems be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like Two Tall Totems tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Custom Software Development, iOS App Development, iPhone App Development and Mobile App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $100 - $149.
What kinds of industries has Two Tall Totems actually built for?
Two Tall Totems has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Fashion & Apparel, Automotive, Telecommunications, Construction, Environmental Services and Aerospace & Defense.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies