Home Top Developers Blog Write For Us Write a Review Sign In Create Account Request a Quote

[x]cube LABS

Write a Review Claim this Company
4.6/5 (6 reviews)
+18008055783 connect@xcubelabs.com Visit Website

About [x]cube LABS

It is one of the best mobile solutions company. They don't just create mobile apps but they actively work on building solutions that resolve actual problems and they partner with their clients. They see themselves not as technologists or designers, but as productive problem solvers who are starting the box of whats possible every day to provide different products & services.

Last updated May 13, 2026

Services

Mobile App Development VR App Development AR App Development Wearable App Development UI-UX Design Custom Software Development Enterprise App Modernization Game Development

Industries Served

Legal Services Retail & E-commerce Information Technology Telecommunications Government & Public Sector Construction

[x]cube LABS Reviews

Write a Review

Data engineering quality that will support our growth for years without a rebuild

Siobhan Gallagher / Chief Technology Officer - Northumbria FinTech Ltd
Verified
Jan 06, 2026

Project summary: Our engineering capacity was committed to maintaining existing systems and could not absorb a net-new build of this complexity. An external partner with the right skills was the only viable option.

The thing that retrospectively seems most significant is how little drama there was. Complex technology projects tend to accumulate incidents, escalations, and tense conversations. This one did not. Problems were surfaced before they became incidents. Scope changes were handled with process rather than conflict. Risks were managed rather than avoided. That level of maturity is rare in my experience and it made the delivery feel almost effortless from our side, which I know it was not from theirs.

PROS

Clear and consistent communication adapted appropriately for both technical and non-technical stakeholders, shared tooling that gave our team real-time visibility, reliable sprint delivery throughout

CONS

Pipeline availability for kickoff required a few weeks of lead time — in hindsight that selection pressure means you are working with a team that is in demand for the right reasons

4.5
Overall
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Communication
Project TypeData & Analytics
IndustryConstruction
Project Cost$500,000+
DurationJan 2025 – Nov 2025

Questions & Answers

Please describe your company, your role, and the industry you operate in.
I lead technology at Northumbria FinTech Ltd, a growth-stage Construction business based in Edinburgh, UK. As Chief Technology Officer my remit spans product engineering, platform operations, and strategic vendor partnerships. We had reached an inflection point where our internal capacity was not sufficient to execute our roadmap at the pace our market required.
What specific problem or business challenge led you to hire this company?
A competitive threat had accelerated our roadmap. We had planned a significant Data & Analytics investment for the following year. External pressure moved that timeline forward by six months and required us to find an external partner rather than attempting to build internally in the time available.
What services did the company provide for your project?
The scope covered the full Data & Analytics lifecycle: discovery and requirements definition, solution architecture, iterative development across twelve sprints, integration testing, performance validation, production deployment, and a structured four-week hypercare period. They also provided system documentation and a knowledge transfer programme for our internal team.
Why did you choose this company over other providers you considered?
A trusted peer in the Construction sector had used them for a comparable Data & Analytics engagement and their recommendation was unequivocal. Our own due diligence confirmed the pattern they described. The combination of domain knowledge, Data & Analytics depth, and demonstrated delivery discipline was the deciding factor.
How clearly did the company understand your requirements and business goals?
Comprehensively. The discovery phase they ran was more thorough than anything we had experienced with previous vendors. They challenged requirements that were vague or contradictory, proposed alternatives where our initial thinking was limiting, and produced a functional specification that our internal stakeholders agreed was the clearest articulation of the product they had seen written down.
How was your overall experience with their communication and project management?
Professional and efficient. The project manager maintained a clear view of the critical path at all times and communicated changes to it transparently. The one significant scope adjustment we made mid-project was handled through a clean change request process — fairly priced, clearly documented, and absorbed without disrupting the overall timeline.
Did the company deliver the project on time and within your expected budget?
Yes to both. There was a single sprint where a dependency on a third-party API introduced a one-week delay. The team identified it three weeks in advance, presented two mitigation options, and we agreed on an approach that recovered the schedule within the same sprint cycle. That level of foresight is what separates good project management from reactive problem management.
What tangible results or business impact have you seen since the project was completed?
Quantifying the impact precisely is complicated by other variables in our business, but the metrics we can attribute directly to the Data & Analytics work are meaningful: session duration up, conversion rate up, error rate down, and our NPS for the digital touchpoint has improved by eleven points. Our account managers report that the new capability is coming up positively in client conversations.
What did you like most about working with this company?
The post-launch behaviour. Some vendors consider go-live to be the end of their professional obligation. This team treated it as the transition to a different kind of engagement. The hypercare period was substantive, the documentation was thorough and genuinely useful, and they checked in proactively at the thirty-day and ninety-day marks to review production metrics with us.
Would you recommend this company to others, and would you work with them again?
Absolutely. With a specific note that the value starts in the discovery phase — clients who approach that process with seriousness will get the most from the engagement. We invested appropriately at the front end and the returns are evident in what was delivered.

Company Info

Founded 2008
Employees 50 - 249
Hourly Rate $25 - $49
Client Rating 4.6/5 (6 reviews)

Rating Breakdown

Quality
4.3
Schedule
4.7
Cost
4.5
Communication
4.6

FAQs

Has [x]cube LABS actually shipped a SaaS product before?
It's a common line of work for a company like [x]cube LABS — multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing hooked up properly, and cloud-native deployment built for a product meant to scale as a service rather than a one-off build. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Information Technology, Construction, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce and Telecommunications, and it reports a team size of 50 - 249 professionals.
What's the easiest way to actually get in touch with [x]cube LABS?
Most businesses reach [x]cube LABS through its website, a direct email, or a contact form — any of which works for discussing what you need, booking an initial conversation, or asking for a rough estimate. For context, it has served clients in USA, and its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Custom Software Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Game Development and Mobile App Development.
What kinds of industries has [x]cube LABS actually built for?
[x]cube LABS has delivered projects across a range of different industries, including Government & Public Sector, Information Technology, Construction, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce and Telecommunications.
Roughly how long does a project with [x]cube LABS take start to finish?
It depends heavily on scope. A lean MVP might be a matter of weeks, while a full enterprise system or a larger digital transformation project can stretch into months once you factor in development, testing, and deployment. With a team of 50 - 249 professionals, [x]cube LABS can scale resources based on project urgency.
Is [x]cube LABS more of an offshore setup or a local team?
That depends on where [x]cube LABS is based and who they primarily serve — some firms like this operate fully offshore, some are local-first, and plenty run a hybrid model that mixes both. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Information Technology, Construction, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2008.
How do I actually get a real proposal out of [x]cube LABS instead of a generic reply?
The most reliable route is giving [x]cube LABS a clear, specific brief up front — through their website form, a direct email, or a call — since a vague ask tends to get a vague answer back, while a concrete one usually gets a proper estimate. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Custom Software Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Game Development and Mobile App Development, and it has served clients in USA.
What makes [x]cube LABS worth considering over other options?
What tends to set [x]cube LABS apart usually comes down to some mix of technical depth, relevant industry experience, how clients describe working with them, their development approach, communication habits, and whether they can actually deliver something that scales. Founded in 2008, the company has built a track record of delivering projects across various industries.
Can [x]cube LABS take on an old, outdated system rather than starting from scratch?
Modernizing legacy software is usually within scope for a firm like [x]cube LABS — re-platforming, refactoring old code, and moving things onto current frameworks or cloud infrastructure without necessarily rebuilding everything from zero. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Custom Software Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Game Development and Mobile App Development, and its typical hourly rate is around $25 - $49.
What should I actually be looking at when comparing a company like [x]cube LABS to others?
When you're weighing up a software partner such as [x]cube LABS, it's worth looking past the pitch and checking the portfolio, what past clients say, relevant industry background, technical range, how they communicate, pricing structure, project management style, and what support looks like after launch. For context, its listed capabilities span AR App Development, Custom Software Development, Enterprise App Modernization, Game Development and Mobile App Development, and its average project cost is reported at $5000000+.
Would [x]cube LABS be a good fit for an early-stage startup?
Generally, yes — companies like [x]cube LABS tend to work well with startups because of what they typically offer: MVP builds, product strategy input, architecture that can scale later, and dedicated teams that keep costs manageable while still moving fast. For context, it has experience across industries such as Government & Public Sector, Information Technology, Construction, Legal Services, Retail & E-commerce and Telecommunications, and it has been operating since 2008.

Similar Companies

Nearby Companies